Totally outragious, that’s what it is…
I’m flying to California on Monday to meet the WANdisco team. I’d rather not fly. I’d like to sail over and maintain my green credentials. But it would take too long so flying it is.
I’m going from Heathrow. The flights are the cheapest and direct, but that means I have to get from Sheffield to London to arrive before 9 in the morning. Not a problem you’d think. We have these great things called trains.
Think again sucker
It’s not that there isn’t a train. There’s enough, even for a peak morning into the capital. But what I wasn’t expecting was the cheapest return fare available, more than a week in advance, of £178. YEP. You read that right. £178. Which by the way is the same price as the direct flight from Heathrow to San Francisco.
So, here I am, stuffed. Until someone suggested something I wouldn’t even dream of. Fly to London from Sheffield. Excuse me? What? That’s just silly.
But it’s true. An hour and £116 later I’ve booked a return flight from Manchester to Heathrow and I’ve just brought myself an extra hour in bed into the bargain. I’m pretty appalled by this - I know enough about the reasons why it’s the case, but the fact is it’s plain wrong / bordering on criminal. It should not cost the same for me to go from Sheffield to London and back as from London to California. It should not be cheaper to fly to London than to take the train. Never ever ever.
And so there it is, I’ve had to compromise myself stupidly and I’m pissed off about it because it’s so totally avoidable. How the Daily Telegraph can spend two weeks exposing MPs with two houses but it doesn’t give a shit about a scandal like this is about everything that’s wrong with this country.
Only a moron would choose the train.



This is another good example of how work compromises principles
Hey Ian
When I travel to the US, I tend to fly from Manchester directly. US Airways and Continental fly to the East Coast (Philladelphia and Newark respectively) and allow connections to the West coast. This supports jobs at the airport in the North and makes the routes economical so that they will exist in the future. This also removes the leg work required to get to London.
Andy
Hey Andy. I’ve done it that way round now too and overall I think you’re right - it’s preferable. The big downside is that connecting in the US you have to collect and then re-check your baggage and go through US customs twice.You need to allow plenty of time for that. Letting BA do the baggage swap and internal transfer at Heathrow was actually very efficient…